Barry Smith
Papers on parthood and anatomy
Barry Smith and
Berit Brogaard, “Sixteen
Days”, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 28
(2003), 45–78.
On the question of the relation
between fetus and mother and the relevance of this question to the question
when the human individual begins to exist.
Barry
Smith, Igor Papakin and Katherine Munn, 2003, “Bodily Systems and the
Modular Structure of the Human Body”, Proceedings
of the 9th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Lecture Notes
on Artificial Intelligence 2780), Berlin: Springer, 2003, 86–90.
Medical science conceives the human body as a
system comprised of many subsystems at a variety of levels. At the highest
level are bodily systems proper, such as the endocrine system, which are
central to our understanding of human anatomy, and play a key role in diagnosis
and in dynamic modeling as well as in medical pedagogy and computer
visualization. In this paper we seek to formulate an explicit definition of
what a bodily system is.
Barry Smith, Igor Papakin and Katherine Munn, “Bodily Systems and the
Spatial-Functional Structure of the Human Body”, in D. M. Pisanelli (ed.), Ontologies in Medicine: Proceedings of the Workshop on Medical
Ontologies, Rome October 2003 (Studies
in Health and Technology Informatics, 102 (2004)), Amsterdam: IOS Press,
2004, 39–63.
Continues the arguments of the previous paper
Barry Smith and Cornelius Rosse, “The Role of Foundational Relations
in the Alignment of Biomedical Ontologies”, in M. Fieschi, et al. (eds.), Medinfo 2004, Amsterdam: IOS Press, 444–448.
The Foundational Model of Anatomy (FMA)
symbolically represents the structural organization of the human body from the
macromolecular to the macroscopic levels, with the goal of providing a robust
and consistent scheme for classifying anatomical entities that is designed to
serve as a reference ontology in biomedical
informatics. Here we articulate the need for formally clarifying the is-a and part-of relations in the FMA and similar ontology and terminology
systems.
78. Barry Smith and Anand Kumar, “On the Proper
Treatment of Pathologies in Biomedical Ontologies”, Proceedings of Bio-Ontologies Workshop, Intelligent Systems for
Molecular Biology (ISMB 2005), Detroit, 22–23.
We extend our work on formal definitions in the
previous paper to the treatment of pathologies.
Stephan Schulz, Philipp
Daumke, Barry Smith and Udo Hahn, “How to
Distinguish Parthood from Location in Bioontologies”, Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium 2005, Washington DC, 669–673. PMC1560856
A closer analysis of the spatial relations in
biological organisms reveals that the decision as to whether a given particular
is part-of a second particular or
whether it is only contained-in the second particular is often controversial. We here propose a
rule-based approach which allows us to decide on the basis of well-defined
criteria which of the two relations holds between two anatomical objects, given
that one spatially includes the other.
Barry Smith, “On
Classifying Material Entities in Basic Formal Ontology”, in Interdisciplinary Ontology. Proceedings
of the Third Interdisciplinary Ontology Meeting, Tokyo: Keio University Press, 2012, 1-13.
On objects and their
parts, and the conditions for integrity.